Difference between revisions of "Newsoundslider"

From VideoLAN Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '== new sound slider proposals == File:Newslider_010210.png * Pros ** Combines two modes * Cons ** Undefined behaviour between Normal sound state & boosted sound state ** B...')
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== new sound slider proposals ==
+
== new sound slider proposals ==
  
[[File:Newslider_010210.png]]
+
[[Image:Newslider 010210.png]]  
  
* Pros
+
*Pros  
** Combines two modes
+
**Combines two modes
  
* Cons
+
*Cons  
** Undefined behaviour between Normal sound state & boosted sound state
+
**Undefined behaviour between Normal sound state & boosted sound state  
** Boost mode should be dBA values
+
**Boost mode should be dBA values
 +
 
 +
== new implementation ==
 +
 
 +
Current implementation is using library variables & functions within widgets itself.
 +
Sound values changes if in hardmix mode and depends on global defines & lib max values.
 +
No real split between values and representation then.
 +
 
 +
New implementation requires and interface layer/adaptor between UI & library. (wraps C or use existing C++ wrappers)
 +
Sound is 0-100%. UI doesn't have to care about library values.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Dev Discussions]]

Latest revision as of 14:41, 1 October 2013

new sound slider proposals

Newslider 010210.png

  • Pros
    • Combines two modes
  • Cons
    • Undefined behaviour between Normal sound state & boosted sound state
    • Boost mode should be dBA values

new implementation

Current implementation is using library variables & functions within widgets itself. Sound values changes if in hardmix mode and depends on global defines & lib max values. No real split between values and representation then.

New implementation requires and interface layer/adaptor between UI & library. (wraps C or use existing C++ wrappers) Sound is 0-100%. UI doesn't have to care about library values.