Newsoundslider: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fcartegnie (talk | contribs) Created page with '== new sound slider proposals == File:Newslider_010210.png * Pros ** Combines two modes * Cons ** Undefined behaviour between Normal sound state & boosted sound state ** B...' |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== new sound slider proposals == | == new sound slider proposals == | ||
[[ | [[Image:Newslider 010210.png]] | ||
* Pros | *Pros | ||
** Combines two modes | **Combines two modes | ||
* Cons | *Cons | ||
** Undefined behaviour between Normal sound state & boosted sound state | **Undefined behaviour between Normal sound state & boosted sound state | ||
** Boost mode should be dBA values | **Boost mode should be dBA values | ||
== new implementation == | |||
Current implementation is using library variables & functions within widgets itself. | |||
Sound values changes if in hardmix mode and depends on global defines & lib max values. | |||
No real split between values and representation then. | |||
New implementation requires and interface layer/adaptor between UI & library. (wraps C or use existing C++ wrappers) | |||
Sound is 0-100%. UI doesn't have to care about library values. | |||
[[Category:Dev Discussions]] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:41, 1 October 2013
new sound slider proposals
- Pros
- Combines two modes
- Cons
- Undefined behaviour between Normal sound state & boosted sound state
- Boost mode should be dBA values
new implementation
Current implementation is using library variables & functions within widgets itself. Sound values changes if in hardmix mode and depends on global defines & lib max values. No real split between values and representation then.
New implementation requires and interface layer/adaptor between UI & library. (wraps C or use existing C++ wrappers) Sound is 0-100%. UI doesn't have to care about library values.