Difference between revisions of "Talk:Win32CompileMSYSNew"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rogerdpack (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
--[[User:Mcross|Mcross]] 18:55, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Mcross|Mcross]] 18:55, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Fixed) | ||
When I installed msys, from the msys prompt, /usr/ is equivalent to C:\msys\1.0\, so wherever you see jb refer to /usr/win32/, I had to use only /win32/ | When I installed msys, from the msys prompt, /usr/ is equivalent to C:\msys\1.0\, so wherever you see jb refer to /usr/win32/, I had to use only /win32/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | (noted) | ||
I also needed to get and build a recent x264 snapshot (latest trunk needs >0.76). | I also needed to get and build a recent x264 snapshot (latest trunk needs >0.76). | ||
| Line 15: | Line 19: | ||
--[[User:Diblo Dk|Diblo Dk]] 22:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Diblo Dk|Diblo Dk]] 22:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What looks incorrect? Did it cause failures? [[User:Rogerdpack|Rogerdpack]] 21:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:27, 21 September 2010
The links to update autoconf, automake, and libtool seem incorrect - they install into /usr/local and contain executables named with the version number (as in 'autoconf-2.61'). The MSYS versions seem to work better, as in:
- http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/MSYS%20System%20Builder/autoconf-2.61-MSYS-1.0.11-1.tar.bz2/download
- http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/MSYS%20System%20Builder/automake-1.10-MSYS-1.0.11-1.tar.bz2/download
- http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/MSYS%20System%20Builder/libtool1.5-1.5.25a-20070701-MSYS-1.0.11-1.tar.bz2/download
--Mcross 18:55, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
(Fixed)
When I installed msys, from the msys prompt, /usr/ is equivalent to C:\msys\1.0\, so wherever you see jb refer to /usr/win32/, I had to use only /win32/
(noted)
I also needed to get and build a recent x264 snapshot (latest trunk needs >0.76).
--Simonh 29 Sept 2009
- Fix libtool search dirs, seem incorrect.
--Diblo Dk 22:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
What looks incorrect? Did it cause failures? Rogerdpack 21:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
