Difference between revisions of "Documentation Talk:Modules"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Categorisation scheme: new section) |
m (Replace redlink with wikilink: Documentation:Modules/http_inft → Documentation:Modules/http_intf) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Documentation:Modules/ncurses|ncurses]] | [[Documentation:Modules/ncurses|ncurses]] | ||
| | | | ||
| − | [[Documentation:Modules/ | + | [[Documentation:Modules/http_intf|HTTP]]<br/> |
[[Documentation:Modules/hotkeys|Hotkeys]]<br/> | [[Documentation:Modules/hotkeys|Hotkeys]]<br/> | ||
[[Documentation:Modules/lirc|lirc]] | [[Documentation:Modules/lirc|lirc]] | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 14 March 2019
Would a layout with tables be better for the index ? (The current page is quite long) Example for the "Interfaces" section:
| Graphical | Text | Other |
|---|---|---|
Dionoea 14:40, 15 December 2006 (CET)
Categorisation scheme
I'm coding these modules to be sorted en masse. The MediaWiki parser can examine the template code and dynamically add modules to sub-categories of Category:Modules; all that is required is a parser function and a description of where to sort pages. Changing category names can be done very easily (2 edits) if we want to rename any module category.
I think it is an improvement, so I'm going ahead with it. If anyone has any questions or concerns, leave me a message. DoesItReallyMatter (talk) 04:39, 13 March 2019 (CET)
